As part of our expanded Players To Watch section, we continue to unveil our regional rankings for 2013 Boys. Today we focus on the Eastern part of the country, with lists from the Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York and Northeast regions.

These are four of our 16 regions, and this week we have now released rankings of all 16 regions for 2013 Boys.

As we move forward with our summer update of National Top 150 (our 2013 Boys national list was released Monday) player rankings over the next several weeks, we’ll examine each age group more closely via these regional lists. This is just the first installment. We’ll have regional lists every Tuesday through Friday of weeks when we introduce a national list on Monday. We’ll also be expanding these regional lists each quarter to recognize more and more players as we continue scouring the countryside to find the top soccer talent.

Among the top-ranked players by region today are Philadelphia Union professional Zachary Pfeffer in Pennsylvania, New York Red Bulls youth standout and Akron verbal commitment Adam Najem in New Jersey, Albertson SC midfielder Miguel Polley in New York and New England Revolution professional Diego Fagundez in the Northeast.

You can see the Regional Ranking pages HERE.

All 16 regional lists for the Summer update are complete, but as mentioned above, we will continue adding to these lists with each quarterly update.

Next week, we will release the national and regional lists for 2013 Girls.

As far as how we arrive at the rankings, it’s no simple task.

We keep a national database of players as the starting point for our rankings (if you’re not in it, enter a profile HERE). We track an extensive list of selections to national team camps and other honors including USSF Development Academy (Boys), ECNL (Girls), and U.S. Youth Soccer National League event and season awards, plus U.S. Soccer Training Centers, ODP, id2 and other player identification programs.

From there we look at additional signs of top player performance in a club environment, with the help of an extensive network of observers around the country, especially college, club and other coaches on the ground (recruiting interest shown is a major factor). As a matter of policy, we never share which coaches said what about whom. Another policy is that parents’ opinions about their own children are not considered, but you are welcome to provide feedback about honors and other details that may be of help to us in keeping their profiles up to date and sifting through thousands of players nationwide.

In the end, there’s always some level of subjectivity about players, because after all, how good someone is relative to someone else is largely a matter of opinion, but we do our best to make our rankings as educated an opinion as can be. 

---

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Men's NCAA Tournament First Round Recap

Women's NCAA Tournament Second Round Recap

Vanderbilt Shocks No. 1 Florida State